Trump’s approach to healthcare may be the best example of the new conservative approach. In the past, the parties have had to decide whether to side … - Charlie Kirk

A two-party cartel, entrenched and self-serving, soon looks like the most natural manifestation of democracy imaginable. The heads of those two parties argue when they must, each party hoping to differentiate itself from the other just enough to eke out a victory in the next election — but neither wants to argue for, or if elected institute, change so fundamental that it would destroy all the stuff that the leaders of the two parties have in common with each other and not with you, the general public: unearned use of $4 trillion a year, the power to regulate, and the endless attention of fawning lobbyists and Washington powerbrokers.

Greatness, on the other hand, requires the liberty and the drive to make the most of yourself.

When Trump resists constant calls for more military intervention around the world — when he says no to putting more troops in Syria and publicly contemplates pulling troops out of Afghanistan — he is not only pointing the way to peace but implicitly taking on a system of defense contractors and sometimes-opportunistic allies that has reshaped American thinking in a profoundly unhealthy way.