Unlimited Quote Collections
Organize your favorite quotes without limits. Create themed collections for every occasion with Premium.
If anything deserves a reward, it is social contribution. Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so far as society is free to use the r… - Richard Stallman
" "If anything deserves a reward, it is social contribution. Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so far as society is free to use the results. If programmers deserve to be rewarded for creating innovative programs, by the same token they deserve to be punished if they restrict the use of these programs.
English
Collect this quote
About Richard Stallman
Richard Matthew Stallman (born 16 March 1953), often known as rms or RMS, is the founder of the Free Software movement, the GNU project, the Free Software Foundation, and the League for Programming Freedom. He also invented the concept of copyleft to protect the ideals of this movement, and enshrined this concept in the widely-used GPL (General Public License) for software.
Biography information from Wikiquote
Also Known As
Pen Names:
rms
•
Saint IGNUcius
Birth Name:
Richard Matthew Stallman
Alternative Names:
Richard M. Stallman
•
R. Stallman
•
St. IGNUcius
•
Chief GNUisance
•
RMS
Related quotes. More quotes will automatically load as you scroll down, or you can use the load more buttons.
Additional quotes by Richard Stallman
People could no longer learn hacking the way I did, by starting to work on a real operating system, making real improvements. In fact, in the 1980s I often came across newly graduated computer science majors who had never seen a real program in their lives. They had only seen toy exercises, school exercises, because every real program was a trade secret. They never had the experience of writing features for users to really use, and fixing the bugs that real users came across. The things you need to know to do real work.
Try QuoteGPT
Chat naturally about what you need. Each answer links back to real quotes with citations.
It may be true that one can reach more microcomputer users with advertising. If this is really so, a business which advertises the service of copying and mailing GNU for a fee ought to be successful enough to pay for its advertising and more. This way, only the users who benefit from the advertising pay for it. On the other hand, if many people get GNU from their friends, and such companies don't succeed, this will show that advertising was not really necessary to spread GNU. Why is it that free market advocates don't want to let the free market decide this?
Loading...