24 It is worthwhile to take a moment to understand the difference between a structural and a functional network. “Structure” refers simply to the phy… - Michael S. Gazzaniga

" "

24 It is worthwhile to take a moment to understand the difference between a structural and a functional network. “Structure” refers simply to the physical anatomy of a network: how many neurons, how they are arranged, their shape, and so forth. A functional network performs a certain function; it may have to do with speaking language, or it may have to do with understanding language. Importantly, the structure of a network does not reveal its function, or vice versa.

English
Collect this quote

About Michael S. Gazzaniga

Michael S. Gazzaniga (born December 12, 1939) is an American neuroscientist, author and professor of psychology at the University of California, Santa Barbara, where he heads the new SAGE Center for the Study of the Mind.

Biography information from Wikiquote

Also Known As

Native Name: Michael Steven Gazzaniga
Alternative Names: Gazzaniga, M.S. M. S. Gazzaniga Michael S Gazzaniga Gazzaniga, Michael S.
Try QuoteGPT

Chat naturally about what you need. Each answer links back to real quotes with citations.

Related quotes. More quotes will automatically load as you scroll down, or you can use the load more buttons.

Additional quotes by Michael S. Gazzaniga

When shown a series of photographs of five natural landscapes — tropical rain forest, temperate deciduous forest, coniferous forest, savanna, and desert — the youngest subjects (those in the third and fifth grades) picked the savanna as a preferred landscape. Older subjects equally preferred those landscapes with which they were familiar, as well as the savanna.52 People were happier viewing scenes with trees rather than inanimate objects, and also preferred the shapes of trees with spreading canopies, similar to those found on the African savanna, rather than rounded or columnar ones.

Robert Sapolsky, professor of neurology at Stanford, makes the extremely strong statement: “It’s boggling that the legal system’s gold standard for an insanity defense — M’Naghten — is based on 166-year-old science. Our growing knowledge about the brain makes notions of volition, culpability, and, ultimately, the very premise of a criminal justice system, deeply suspect.

Loading...