Either by God you mean something definite or you don't mean something definite. If by God you mean a personality who is concerned about human beings,… - Steven Weinberg

" "

Either by God you mean something definite or you don't mean something definite. If by God you mean a personality who is concerned about human beings, who did all this out of love for human beings, who watches us and who intervenes, then I would have to say in the first place how do you know, what makes you think so? And in the second place, is that really an explanation? If that's true, what explains that? Why is there such a God? It isn't the end of the chain of whys, it just is another step, and you have to take the step beyond that.

English
Collect this quote

About Steven Weinberg

Steven Weinberg (born 3 May 1933 – 23 July 2021) was an American physicist. He was awarded the 1979 Nobel Prize in Physics (with colleagues Abdus Salam and Sheldon Glashow) for combining electromagnetism and the weak force into the electroweak force.

Limited Time Offer

Premium members can get their quote collection automatically imported into their Quotewise collections.

Related quotes. More quotes will automatically load as you scroll down, or you can use the load more buttons.

Additional quotes by Steven Weinberg

In the case where the universe does not recollapse, the proper distance to the is...<math>d_{MAX}(t) = a(t) \int_{0}^{r_{MAX}(t)} \frac{dr}{\sqrt{1-Kr^2}} = a(t)\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{dt'}{a(t')}</math>... In the absence of a cosmological constant, <math>a(t)</math> grows like <math>t^{\frac{2}{3}}</math>, and the integral diverges, so there is no event horizon. But with a cosmological constant, <math>a(t)</math> will eventually grow as exp(<math>Ht</math>) with <math>H = H_0 \Omega^{1/2}_\Lambda</math> constant and... an event horizon... approaches... <math>d_{MAX}(\infty) = 1/H</math>. As time passes all sources of light outside our gravitationally bound will move beyond this... and become unobservable. The same is true for the quintessence theory... In that case <math>a(t)</math> eventually grows as exp(const <math>\times\, t^{2/{(2+\frac{\alpha}{2})}}</math>), so for any <math>\alpha \ge 0</math> the integral... [<math>d_{MAX}(t)</math>] converges.

PREMIUM FEATURE

Advanced Search Filters

Filter search results by source, date, and more with our premium search tools.

Planck’s quantization assumption applied to the matter that emits and absorbs radiation, not to radiation itself. As George Gamow later remarked, Planck thought that radiation was like butter; butter itself comes in any quantity, but it can be bought and sold only in multiples of one quarter pound. It was Albert Einstein (1879–1955) who in 1905 proposed that the energy of radiation of frequency ν was itself an integer multiple of hν.

Loading...