One of the things that excited me so much about quantum chromodynamics after the work of Gross and Wilczek and Politzer was that it seemed to provide… - Steven Weinberg

" "

One of the things that excited me so much about quantum chromodynamics after the work of Gross and Wilczek and Politzer was that it seemed to provide a rational explanation for what had always been mysterious to me — the fact that there were symmetries, like parity conservation, charge conjugation invariance, and strangeness conservation, that were very good symmetries of the strong and electromagnetic interactions — as far as we knew exact — and yet were not respected by the weak interactions. Why should nature have ... symmetries that are symmetries of part of nature but not other parts of nature?

English
Collect this quote

About Steven Weinberg

Steven Weinberg (born 3 May 1933 – 23 July 2021) was an American physicist. He was awarded the 1979 Nobel Prize in Physics (with colleagues Abdus Salam and Sheldon Glashow) for combining electromagnetism and the weak force into the electroweak force.

PREMIUM FEATURE
Advanced Search Filters

Filter search results by source, date, and more with our premium search tools.

Related quotes. More quotes will automatically load as you scroll down, or you can use the load more buttons.

Additional quotes by Steven Weinberg

The last thirty years of Einstein's life were largely devoted to a search for a so-called unified field theory that would unify James Clerk Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism with the general theory of relativity, Einstein's theory of gravitation. Einstein's attempt was not successful, and with hindsight we can now see that it was misconceived. Not only did Einstein reject quantum mechanics; the scope of his effort was too narrow. ... Nevertheless Einstein's struggle is our struggle today. It is the search for a final theory.

In the case where the universe does not recollapse, the proper distance to the is...<math>d_{MAX}(t) = a(t) \int_{0}^{r_{MAX}(t)} \frac{dr}{\sqrt{1-Kr^2}} = a(t)\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{dt'}{a(t')}</math>... In the absence of a cosmological constant, <math>a(t)</math> grows like <math>t^{\frac{2}{3}}</math>, and the integral diverges, so there is no event horizon. But with a cosmological constant, <math>a(t)</math> will eventually grow as exp(<math>Ht</math>) with <math>H = H_0 \Omega^{1/2}_\Lambda</math> constant and... an event horizon... approaches... <math>d_{MAX}(\infty) = 1/H</math>. As time passes all sources of light outside our gravitationally bound will move beyond this... and become unobservable. The same is true for the quintessence theory... In that case <math>a(t)</math> eventually grows as exp(const <math>\times\, t^{2/{(2+\frac{\alpha}{2})}}</math>), so for any <math>\alpha \ge 0</math> the integral... [<math>d_{MAX}(t)</math>] converges.

As a special case of Newton's Second Law, a body... when acted on by zero force, will experience zero acceleration—that is, it will move with constant velocity. Newton listed this... as the First Law... The Third Law... action equals reaction: If one body exerts a force on another... the second... exerts an equal force in the opposite direction on the first.

Loading...