However, the absence of perfect concealment does not imply the presence of active advertisement, and if fertility were advertised in humans, we would… - Steve Stewart-Williams

Just as our tools evolved culturally to fit our hands, so too our social roles evolved culturally to fit persisting aspects of the human mind. Roles that jar too violently with human nature are unlikely to persist for long, at least without the application of significant social force. If this is correct, it raises the possibility that some social roles might have evolved culturally to fit traits that, although found in both sexes, are more common in one than the other. This is emphatically not to say that there are some male roles and some female roles. But it is to suggest that there might be some social roles that suit more men than women, and others that suit more women than men — not just because of evolved physical differences but because of evolved psychological differences as well.

From a comparative perspective, we are a relatively monomorphic mammal, with relatively monomorphic minds.

Nature isn’t just a bloodbath; it’s also a vast, unending orgy.