We pretend that if I get result +1 here, immediately the photon there is in the state |x>, but if I find -1, immediately the other photon assume[s] another state of polarization... [T]his image is not acceptable for Einstein because it seems as [though] something is going . ...It is by this ...reasoning that Einstein said... "If you want to make sense of this correlation at a distance, you have to accept that before they arrive at the measuring apparatus, the particles have already a property determining the outcome." ...Bohr disagreed immediately. ...I don't know anybody who finds Bohr's reply understandable. It's not a joke, what I'm going to say, although it sounds [like] a joke. Bohr is so cautious in his wording that he makes it almost impossible to understand... Bohr insisted on... complimentarity, and at one point he declared... that "Clarity and truth are complimentary," and he made all efforts to be as true as possible.
French physicist
Alain Aspect (born June 15, 1947) is a French physicist who performed the crucial "Bell test experiments" that showed that Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen's "spooky action at a distance", did in fact appear to be realised when two particles were separated by an arbitrarily large distance. A correlation between their wave functions remained, as they were once part of the same wave-function that was not disturbed before one of the child particles was measured.
From: Wikiquote (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Showing quotes in randomized order to avoid selection bias. Click Popular for most popular quotes.
The most remarkable feature of Bell's work was undoubtedly the possibility it offered to determine experimentally whether or not Einstein's ideas could be kept. The experimental tests of Bell inequalities gave an unambiguous answer: entanglement cannot be understood as usual correlations, whose interpretation relies on the existence of common properties, originating in a common preparation, and remaining attached to each individual object after separation, as components of their physical reality.
I think it is not an exaggeration to say that the realization of the importance of entanglement and the clarification of the quantum description of single objects have been at the root of a second quantum revolution, and that John Bell was its prophet. And it may well be that this once purely intellectual pursuit will also lead to a new technological revolution.
As a witness of that period, I am also deeply convinced that John Bell indirectly played a crucial role in the progress of the application of quantum mechanics to individual objects, microscopic and mesoscopic. The example of his , that had led to the recognition of the importance of entanglement, was no doubt an encouragement to those who were contemplating the possibility of developing new approaches, beyond the so-efficient paradigm developed decades earlier. His example opened the gate for new quantum explorations.
In 1935, Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and (EPR) wrote a now famous paper questioning the completeness of the formalism of quantum mechanics. Rejecting the idea that a measurement on one particle in an entangled pair could affect the state of the other—distant—particle, they concluded that one must complete the quantum formalism in order to get a reasonable, "local realist," description of the world. This view says a particle carries... locally, all the properties determining the results of any measurement... (The ensemble of these properties constitutes the particle’s physical reality.)
[B]y closing the two main loopholes at the same time, three teams have independently confirmed that we must definitely renounce local realism... Although their findings are... no surprise, they crown decades of experimental effort. The results... place several fundamental quantum information schemes... as device-independent and s, on firmer ground.
Now comes the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen entangled state. Now I see faces, people saying, "Oh..?" Don't worry! When you go to the concert, you don't need to be able to read the music, to enjoy the music. ...So here... [are] equations. It's a pleasure for my colleague physicists. If you can't read the equation, listen to me. I'm not going to sing, but... listen to the words... the words are... a way of describing the equations, and you don't need to know the mathematics...
John Bell devoted most of his efforts to conceptual and theoretical questions. Would he have liked that I also stress the importance of the technological revolutions that were, and will be, enabled by the conceptual revolutions? I cannot tell, but we know that he started his career in accelerator design, and that he always showed a profound respect for technological achievements. I like to think that he would have loved quantum-jumps-based s, as well as entangled s.