मेघ उस वृष्टिदाता की देह बन गया; वह ‘दाता’ कहीं अन्यत्र था, किन्तु हम नहीं जान पाए कि वह कहाँ था या कहाँ है। किन्हीं मंत्रों में ‘पर्जन्य’ ‘द्यौ:’ के पद तक पह… - Friedrich Max Müller

If I live for one purpose it is for this, that I will preach the union of Eastern and Western philosophy, the reconciliation of Europe and Asia. The idea may seem absurd to many in the present age. It may provoke ridicule and angry reviling. But posterity will prove a better judge.

शास्त्रीय प्रज्ञा के विद्वानों ने विचार पर पहरा दिया। खुद मुझे अभी तक वह समय याद है जब मैं लीपजिग में छात्र था और संस्कृत पढ़ना शुरू किया था और किस प्रकार उस समय मेरे शिक्षकों, गोटफ्रीड हरमेन, हाप्ट, वेस्टरमैन, स्टालबाम और अन्य ने संस्कृत और तुलनात्मक व्याकरण की घृणा से टीका की थी।

I have declared again and again that if I say Aryas, I mean neither blood nor bones, nor hair nor skull; I mean simply those who speak an Aryan language. The same applies to Hindus, Greeks, Romans, Germans, Celts, and Slavs. When I speak of them I commit myself to no anatomical characteristics. The blue-eyed and fair-haired Scandinavians may have been conquerors or conquered, they may have adopted the language of their darker lords or their subjects, or vice versa. I assert nothing beyond their language, when I call them Hindus, Greeks, Romans, Germans, Celts and Slavs; and in that sense, and in that sense only, do I say that even the blackest Hindus represent an earlier stage of Aryan speech and thought than the fairest Scandinavians. This may seem strong language, but in matters of such importance we cannot be too decided in our language. To me, an ethnologist who speaks of Aryan race, Aryan blood, Aryan eyes and hair, is as great a sinner as a linguist who speaks of a dolichocephalic dictionary or a brachycephalic grammar. It is worse than a Babylonian confusion of tongues- it is down-right theft. We have made our own terminology for the classification of language; let ethnologists make their own for the classification of skulls, and hair and blood.