Advanced Search Filters
Filter search results by source, date, and more with our premium search tools.
" "این ادّعا که طبیعت دو جنس آنها را با وظایف و جایگاه کنونیشان انطباق میدهد و این وظایف را برای آنان مناسب میسازد، نیز فایدهای در بر ندارد. من با تکیه بر عقل سلیم و سرشت ذهن بشر، به هیچ روی نمیتوانم بپذیرم که کسی طبیعت این یا آن جنس را بشناسد، و یا اصولا شناخت طبیعت آنها امکانپذیر باشد. طبیعت این دو، مادام که مناسبات کنونی را با هم دارند، قابل شناخت نیست.
اگر مردان در جامعهای بدون زن، و زنان در جامعهای بدون مرد بهسر برده بودند، و یا اگر جامعهای شکل گرفته بود که در آن زنان زیر سلطهی مردان نبودند، آنگاه میتوانستیم دربارهی تفاوتهای ذهنی و اخلاقیای سخن بگوییم که احتمالا از طبیعت آنان سرچشمه میگیرند. آنچه را امروز طبیعت زنانه مینامند، چیزی یکسره تصنّعیست، زیرا محصول سرکوب در بعضی جهات و تشویق و ترغیب در جهاتی دیگر است.
John Stuart Mill (20 May 1806 – 8 May 1873), also known as J. S. Mill, was an English political philosopher and economist who was an advocate of utilitarianism.
Biography information from Wikiquote
Filter search results by source, date, and more with our premium search tools.
Related quotes. More quotes will automatically load as you scroll down, or you can use the load more buttons.
He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them. But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side; if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion.
But I now thought that this end [one's happiness] was only to be attained by not making it the direct end. Those only are happy (I thought) who have their minds fixed on some object other than their own happiness[....] Aiming thus at something else, they find happiness along the way[....] Ask yourself whether you are happy, and you cease to be so.
Add semantic quote search to your AI assistant via MCP. One command setup.
How will the remaining portion of the community like to have the amusements that shall be permitted to them regulated by the religious and moral sentiments of the stricter Calvinists and Methodists? Would they not, with considerable peremptoriness, desire these intrusively pious members of society to mind their own business? This is precisely what should be said to every government and every public, who have the pretension that no person shall enjoy any pleasure which they think wrong.