If a is any definite number, then all numbers of the system R fall into two classes, A<sub>1</sub> and A<sub>2</sub>, each of which contains infinite… - Richard Dedekind

" "

If a is any definite number, then all numbers of the system R fall into two classes, A<sub>1</sub> and A<sub>2</sub>, each of which contains infinitely many individuals; the first class A<sub>1</sub> comprises all numbers a<sub>1</sub> that are < a, the second class A<sub>2</sub> comprises all numbers a<sub>2</sub> that are > a; the number a itself may be assigned at pleasure to the first or second class, being respectively the greatest number of the first class or the least of the second. In every case the separation of the system R into the two classes A<sub>1</sub>, A<sub>2</sub> is such that every number of the first class A<sub>1</sub> is less than every number of the second class A<sub>2</sub>.

English
Collect this quote

About Richard Dedekind

(6 October 1831 – 12 February 1916) was a German mathematician who made important contributions to (particularly ), and the definition of the s.

Also Known As

Native Name: Julius Wilhelm Richard Dedekind
PREMIUM FEATURE

Advanced Search Filters

Filter search results by source, date, and more with our premium search tools.

Related quotes. More quotes will automatically load as you scroll down, or you can use the load more buttons.

Additional quotes by Richard Dedekind

The statement is so frequently made that the differential calculus deals with continuous magnitude, and yet an explanation of this continuity is nowhere given; even the most rigorous expositions of the differential calculus do not base their proofs upon continuity but, with more or less consciousness of the fact, they either appeal to geometric notions or those suggested by geometry, or depend upon theorems which are never established in a purely arithmetic manner. Among these, for example, belongs the above mentioned theorem, and a more careful investigation convinced me that this theorem, or any one equivalent to it, can be regarded in some way as a sufficient basis for infinitesimal analysis. It then only remained to discover its true origin in the elements of arithmetic and thus at the same time to secure a real definition of the essence of continuity. I succeeded Nov. 24, 1858.

Go Premium

Support Quotewise while enjoying an ad-free experience and premium features.

View Plans
As professor in the Polytechnic School [autumn of 1858] in Zurich I found myself for the first time obliged to lecture upon the elements of the differential calculus and felt, more keenly than ever before, the lack of a really scientific foundation for arithmetic. In discussing the notion of the approach of a variable magnitude to a fixed limiting value, and especially in proving the theorem that every magnitude which grows continually, but not beyond all limits, must certainly approach a limiting value, I had recourse to geometric evidences. Even now such resort to geometric intuition in a first presentation of the differential calculus, I regard as exceedingly useful, from the didactic standpoint, and indeed indispensable, if one does not wish to lose too much time. But that this form of introduction into the differential calculus can make no claim to being scientific, no one will deny. For myself this feeling of dissatisfaction was so overpowering that I made the fixed resolve to keep meditating on the question till I should find a purely arithmetic and perfectly rigorous foundation for the principles of infinitesimal analysis.

Loading...