ID (intelligent design) is essentially a total failure of the imagination; just because you do not see how something could have evolved, doesn’t mean that it didn’t.

Behe has never developed his arguments for intelligent design in peer-reviewed scientific publications. Indeed, he doesn’t actually conduct research in the field and, along with other leaders of the intelligent-design movement, concedes that there is not as yet much affirmative scientific evidence supporting the concept of intelligent design.

A technology that nobody use, just dies.

An idea that is not dangerous is not worthy of being called an idea at all.

No battle can be won in the study, and theory without practice is dead.

Intellectual brilliance is no guarantee against being dead wrong.

Design theorists are no friends of theistic evolution.

Everything intelligent is so boring.

An idea that is not dangerous is unworthy of being called an idea at all.

Designers should only innovate as a last resort.

Having a great intellect is no path to being happy.

Science can never grapple with the irrational. That is why it has no future before it, in this world.

For an idea that does not first seem insane, there is no hope.

Intelligent design is intellectual surrender. Not understanding how something works or how it came to be is not an answer. Our current ignorance should only be motivation to keep working the problems. Everything is irreducibly complex—until a scientist figures it out.