Dreams go by opposites I was once told.

The dream has a very striking way of dealing with the category of opposites and contradictions. This is simply disregarded. To the dream 'No' does not seem to exist. In particular, it prefers to draw opposites together into a unity or to represent them as one. Indeed, it also takes the liberty of representing some random element by its wished-for opposite, so that at first one cannot tell which of the possible poles is meant positively or negatively in the dream-thoughts.

Reality is wrong. Dreams are for real

Dreams pass into the reality of action. From the actions stems the dream again; and this interdependence produces the highest form of living.

Reality is wrong. Dreams are for the real.

Dreams transform into thoughts
And thoughts result in action.

Action is what converts human dreams into significance.

And the opposite of dreams are facts!

Reality is wrong. Dreams are for real.

Action is what separates the do-ers from the dreamers.

Reality is wrong, dreams are for real.

But what, Phaedrus, is the contrary of a dream if not some other dream?… A dream of vigilance and tension dreamt by Reason herself!—And what would such a Reason dream?—If a Reason were to dream—a Reason hard, erect, eyes armed, mouth closed, as though mistress of her lips—would not the dream she dreamt be what we see now—this world of exact forces and studied illusions?—A dream, a dream, but a dream interpenetrated with symmetries, all order, acts and sequences!

A dream is not reality but who's to say which is which?

Our life is composed greatly from dreams, from the unconscious, and they must be brought into connection with action. They must be woven together.