It may be accepted that philosophical thoughts are universal in the sense of being of interest to humans from anywhere on the planet (...) However, i… - Julio Cabrera

When someone (including philosophers) defends the alleged beauty of "having children", they refer to the pleasure of "seeing them grow up": first as children, then as adolescents, and then as graduated and independent adults (this happens not only in wealthy classes but also, in part, in more modest ones). However, it is strange that, when they speak about their children, they inexplicably stop at that point and never refer to their decline, their aging, or their decay; perhaps because they think they will not be there to contemplate this decline. The parents prefer not to see the end of this process, as if the child vanished into thin air. The residual aspect of parenthood is omitted; only the flourishing aspects of the child are visualized. The death of the child-residue is denied any visibility. The consummation of the processes is concealed as something dirty and indecent, not worthy to be shown.

The problem is that they come here and talk about their philosophical problems in their language, and we go there and talk about their philosophical problems in their language.

Porque te amo, não nascerás! Nascituri te salutant, 2009, p. 34 <small></small>