In my opinion, the Union Government's decision to impose President's rule in UP is flawed. That some members of the House indulged in violence and un… - R. Venkataraman

The vocabulary of growth must be held in position by the grammar of financial discipline and the punctuations of a social ideology.

When we framed the Constitution, we adopted the British model. Therefore, the President acts as the crown. You see, Britain has no written constitution. So, there is nothing unconstitutional there. But in India we have a Constitution and any legislation even by Parliament contrary to the Constitution is void. As the Constitution now exists, the President has to follow the British precedent in many matters. Unfortunately, there is no British precedent in this matter.

In a healthy democracy both the ruling party and the opposition have a responsibility to the country and surely the people will judge them in the discharge of that responsibility.