Feminism...is not 'women as victims' but women refusing to be victims.

No. We don't really do that. We feel that objectifies women and that's not really what we're about.

The medical community is not particularly interested in taking the pain of women seriously.

Women have somehow been separated from their libido, from their faculty of desire, from their sexuality. They've become suspicious about it. Like beasts, for example, who are castrated in farming in order to serve their master's ulterior motives — to be fattened or made docile — women have been cut off from their capacity for action. It's a process that sacrifices vigour for delicacy and succulence, and one that's got to be changed.

Just as it is not the penis that commits rape, and not testosterone that drives it and not overwhelming sexual desire either, castration whether surgical or chemical will not eliminate men's hatred of women.

I don’t think we would have been so hard on the woman if we stopped tying acts of service to gender.

Women are not drawn to indicators of evolutionary fitness. If they were, they'd be all over me.

Teaching women how to defend themselves against male rapists is not the same as working to change society so that men will not rape.

Women shun politics these days.

Female castration results in concentration of her feelings upon her male companion, and her impotence in confrontations with her own kind. Because all her love is guided by the search for security, if not for her offspring then for her crippled and fearful self, she cannot expect to find it in her own kind, whom she knows to be weak and unsuitable.

Feminism’s claim that it discovered rape is simply false.

Feminism has exceeded its proper mission of seeking political equality for women and has ended by rejecting contingency, that is, human limitation by nature or fate.

It's better not to argue with women.

Women cannot be completely severe unless they hate.