Our equivalent of the Lord's Prayer was the English author Alan Alexander Milne's poem "Now We Are Six," which ends: But now I am six, I'm as clever … - David A. Sinclair

Bill Gates made a convincing argument for why improving human health is money well spent, and won't lead to overpopulation, in his 2018 video "Does Saving More Lives Lead to Overpopulation?"56 The short answer is: No.
If we were to stop all deaths — every single one around the globe — right now, we would add about 150,000 people to our planet each day. That would be 55 million people each year. That might sound like a lot, but it would be less than a single percentage point. At that rate, we would add a billion people to our ranks every eighteen years, which is still considerably slower than the rate at which the last few billion people have come along and easily countered by the global decline in family sizes.
It's still an increase, but it's not the sort of exponential growth many people fret about when they first encounter the idea of slowing aging.
Recall, these calculations are what we'd face if we ended all deaths right away. And although I'm very optimistic about the prospects for prolonged vitality, I'm not that optimistic. I don't know any reputable scientist who is.

Youth → broken DNA → genome instability → disruption of DNA packaging and gene regulation (the epigenome) → loss of cell identity → cellular senescence → disease → death.

Here's the important point: there are plenty of stressors that will activate longevity genes without damaging the cell, including certain types of exercise, intermittent fasting, low-protein diets, and exposure to hot and cold temperatures (I discuss this in chapter 4).