The notion of a thing is thus seen to be an abstraction, in which it is conceptually separated from its infinite background and substructure. Actuall… - David Bohm

If we accept 'what seems to be' as 'what is', then we can't inquire. I mean, if what seems to be were perfectly coherent, then I'd say 'all right, why question it?' But since it is highly incoherent, I would say there is a good reason to question it. That would be common sense in ordinary areas of life. It does seem that all that is happening — we all want to do things and we can't do what we want. Something else seems to happen which stops us. Some of the people who are running corporations are getting interested in this question because they have the same problem. I know some people who are working in this area, and they find that when their boards get together they can't seem to agree and they can't get the results they intend. That's one of the reasons they are sinking a bit. A fellow named Peter Senge has written a book called The Fifth Discipline. He has analysed some of these questions. I don't say that he's got to the bottom of it, but it's interesting. His analysis shows that very often there are problems because people are not following the effect of their thoughts — that when they think something and something is done, it then spreads out to other companies, and then it comes back a bit later as if it were something else independent.

The perception of truth is an actual act which changes things; it’s not merely that it is the truth about something which is different.

In the long run it is far more dangerous to adhere to illusion than to face what the actual fact is.