Rotations in 3-dimensional Euclidean space ... form the poster child of group theory and are almost indispensable in physics. Think of rotating a rigid object, such as a bust of Newton. After two rotations in succession, the bust, being rigid, has not been deformed in any way; it merely has a different orientation. Thus, the composition of two rotations is another rotation.

Art doesn't transform. It just plain forms.

You don't change the course of history by turning the faces of portraits to the wall.

Most studies employing three-dimensional objects as stimuli have used simultaneous presentation whereas most studies employing two-dimensional objects have used comparison of a single visual stimulus with a memory presentation. We suspect that it is this procedural difference rather than the difference in dimensionality that is the principal determiner of rate of mental rotation.

There has been a great deal of nonsense written... about the mysterious fourth dimension. ...4-dimensional space just consists of points with four coordinates instead of three (...similarly for any number of dimensions). ...[I]magine a telegraph ...over which numbers are ...sent in sets of four. Each set... is a point in 4-d... space.

Rien en art ne doit ressembler à un accident, même le mouvement.

Of course, where magic is involved, appearances don’t mean much.

Gravitation is entirely independent of everything that influences other natural phenomena. It is not subject to absorption or refraction, no velocity of propagation has been observed. You can do whatever you please with a body, you can electrify or magnetise it, you can heat it, melt or evaporate it, decompose it chemically, its behaviour with respect to gravitation is not affected. Gravitation acts on all bodies in the same way, everywhere and always we find it in the same rigorous and simple form, which frustrates all our attempts to penetrate into its internal mechanism.

It may happen that the motion of a rigid figure is such that all the points of a line belonging to this figure remain motionless while all the points situated outside of this line move. Such a line will be called a straight line.

The play is independent of the pages on which it is printed, and 'pure geometries' are independent of lecture rooms, [rough blackboard drawings] or of any other detail of the physical world.
This is the point of view of a pure mathematician. Applied mathematicians, mathematical physicists... take a different view... preoccupied with the physical world itself, which also has its structure or pattern. ...We may be able to trace a ...resemblance between the two sets of relations, and then the pure geometry will become interesting to physicists; it will give us ...a map which 'fits the facts' ...The geometer offers ...a whole set of maps from which to choose.

Just because we toss something to a vote, doesn't change what that something is.Nor does it alter whether that something is inherently good or bad.

Performance art never became a commodity because it’s immaterial.

These artists pay little attention to an encircling present that bears no direct relation to the world of work in which they live, and they therefore see in it nothing more than an indifferent framework for life, either more or less favorable to production.

Consider the geometry of a three-dimensional homogeneous and isotropic space. ...[G]eometry is encoded in a metric <math>g_{ij}(\mathbf{x})</math> (with i and j running over the three coordinate directions), or equivalently a line element <math>ds^2 \equiv g_{ij} dx^i dx^j</math>, with summation over repeated indices... <math>ds</math> is the proper distance between <math>\mathbf{x}</math> and <math>\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{dx}</math>, meaning... the distance measured by a surveyor who uses a... Cartesian [coordinate system] in a small neighborhood of... point <math>\mathbf{x}</math>.) One... homogeneous isotropic three-dimensional space with positive definite lengths is flat space, with line element<math>ds^2=d\mathbf{x}^2</math>...The coordinate transformations that leave this invariant are... ordinary three-dimensional rotations and translations. ...Another ...possibility is a four-dimensional with some radius <math>a</math>, with line element<math>ds^2=d \mathbf{x}^2+dz^2,\;\;z^2 + \mathbf{x}^2 = a^2</math>,...Here the transformations that leave the line element invariant are four-dimensional rotations; the direction of <math>\mathbf{x}</math> can be changed to any other direction by a four-dimensional rotation that does not change <math>z</math>. ...[T]he only other possibility (up to a coordinate transformation) is a hyperspherical surface in four-dimensional , with line element<math>ds^2 = d\mathbf{x}^2 - dz^2,\;\;z^2 - \mathbf{x}^2 = a^2</math>,...where <math>a^2</math> is (so far) an arbitrary positive constant. The coordinate transformations that leave this invariant are four-dimensional pseudo-rotations, just like s, but with <math>z</math> instead of time.