Carl Sagan, American astrophysicist, cosmologist and author (1934–1996)
194 Quotes Tagged: Science
Showing quotes in randomized order to avoid selection bias. Click Popular for most popular quotes.
Enhance Your Quote Experience
Enjoy ad-free browsing, unlimited collections, and advanced search features with Premium.
A number of years ago, when I was a freshly-appointed instructor, I met, for the first time, a certain eminent historian of science. At the time I could only regard him with tolerant condescension.
I was sorry of the man who, it seemed to me, was forced to hover about the edges of science. He was compelled to shiver endlessly in the outskirts, getting only feeble warmth from the distant sun of science- in-progress; while I, just beginning my research, was bathed in the heady liquid heat up at the very center of the glow.
In a lifetime of being wrong at many a point, I was never more wrong. It was I, not he, who was wandering in the periphery. It was he, not I, who lived in the blaze.
I had fallen victim to the fallacy of the 'growing edge;' the belief that only the very frontier of scientific advance counted; that everything that had been left behind by that advance was faded and dead.
But is that true? Because a tree in spring buds and comes greenly into leaf, are those leaves therefore the tree? If the newborn twigs and their leaves were all that existed, they would form a vague halo of green suspended in mid-air, but surely that is not the tree. The leaves, by themselves, are no more than trivial fluttering decoration. It is the trunk and limbs that give the tree its grandeur and the leaves themselves their meaning.
There is not a discovery in science, however revolutionary, however sparkling with insight, that does not arise out of what went before. 'If I have seen further than other men,' said <a href="https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/135106.Isaac_Newton" rel="nofollow noopener" title="Isaac Newton">Isaac Newton</a>, 'it is because I have stood on the shoulders of giants.
Does trying to understand the universe at all betray a lack of humility? I believe it is true that humility is the only just response in a confrontation with the universe, but not a humility that prevents us from seeking the nature of the universe we are admiring. If we seek that nature, then love can be informed by truth instead of being based on ignorance or self-deception. If a Creator God exists, would He or She or It or whatever the appropriate pronoun is, prefer a kind of sodden blockhead who worships while understanding nothing? Or would He prefer His votaries to admire the real universe in all its intricacy? I would suggest that science is, at least in part, informed worship.
Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality. When we recognize our place in an immensity of light‐years and in the passage of ages, when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling, that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual. So are our emotions in the presence of great art or music or literature, or acts of exemplary selfless courage such as those of Mohandas Gandhi or Martin Luther King, Jr. The notion that science and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both.
En el mismo momento en que el hombre descubrió la vastedad del universo y se dio cuenta de que aun sus más disparatadas fantasías eran ínfimas comparadas con la verdadera dimensión de la Vía Láctea, tomó medidas para asegurar que sus descendientes no pudiesen ver las estrellas en lo más mínimo. Durante un millón de años, los humanos se han criado en el contacto diario, personal, con la bóveda celeste. En los últimos milenios comenzaron a construir las ciudades y a emigrar hacia ellas. En el curso de las últimas décadas, gran parte de la población humana abandonó una forma rústica de vida. A medida que avanzaba la tecnología y se contaminaban los centros urbanos, las noches se fueron quedando sin estrellas. Nuevas generaciones alcanzaron la madurez ignorando totalmente el firmamento que había pasmado a sus mayores y estimulado el advenimiento de la era moderna de la ciencia y la tecnología. Sin darse cuenta siquiera, justo cuando la astronomía entraba en su edad de oro, la mayoría de la gente se apartaba del cielo en un aislamiento cósmico que sólo terminó con los albores de la exploración espacial.
All that we have seen is something of a vast and intricate and lovely universe. There is no particular theological conclusion that comes out of an exercise such as the one we have just gone through. What is more, when we understand something of the astronomical dynamics, the evolution of worlds, we recognize that worlds are born and worlds die, they have lifetimes just as humans do, and therefore that there is a great deal of suffering and death in the cosmos if there is a great deal of life.
Plainly, there's something within me that's ready to believe in life after death. And it's not the least bit interested in whether there's any sober evidence for it.
So I don't guffaw at the woman who visits her husband's grave and chats him up every now and then, maybe on the anniversary of his death. It's not hard to understand. And if I have difficulties with the ontological status of who she's talking to, that's all right.
That's not what this is about. This is about humans being human.