For now, the critical task is to organize activist popular movements to change popular consciousness and understanding, to shape legislation, and to … - Noam Chomsky

[Q: do you believe that a nation should suffer a detrimental cost in order to compensate for wrongs committed by the governors of that nations, or by segments of that nation in the past?] Suppose you're living under a dictatorship, and the dictators carry out some horrendous acts. So you're living in Stalinist Russia, let's say, and Stalin carries out horrible crimes. Are the people of Russia responsible for those crimes? Well, to only a very limited extent, because living under a brutal, harsh, terrorist regime, there isn't very much they can do about it. There's something they can do, and to the extent that you can do something, you're responsible for what happens. Suppose you're living in a free, democratic society, with lots of privilege, enormous, incomparable freedoms, and the government carries out violent, brutal acts. Are you responsible for it? Yeah, a lot more responsible, because there's a lot that you can do about it. If you share responsibility in criminal acts, you are liable for the consequences.

I see no anti-Semitic implications in denial of the existence of gas chambers, or even denial of the Holocaust
I see no hint of anti-Semitic implications in Faurisson's work.

Anarchists try to identify power structures. They urge those exercising power to justify themselves. This justification does not succeed most of the time.