Limited Time Offer
Premium members can get their quote collection automatically imported into their Quotewise collections.
" "Spinoza is a highly systematic thinker, but still I do not think I can offer a single key for all things Spinozistic. Personally, one thing which got me excited about Spinoza is his philosophical boldness, i.e., his willingness to pursue philosophical exploration as far as he can, making very little concessions to commonly accepted beliefs and norms. In terms of content, I take his attempt to conceive of God, nature, and ethics in a manner that is free from anthropomorphism and anthropocentric illusions as one of the deepest elements of his philosophical thinking. A closely related issue is his advocacy of actual infinity (an issue that has been mostly neglected in recent literature). Finally, the very attempt to do philosophy systematically (rather than rely on fragmented and disassociated intuitions) and transparently (laying bare the logical structure of his arguments) commands my respect, indeed admiration.
Benedictus de Spinoza (24 November 1632 – 21 February 1677) was a social and metaphysical philosopher known for the elaborate development of his monist philosophy, which has become known as Spinozism. Controversy regarding his ideas led to his excommunication from the Jewish community of his native Amsterdam. He was named Baruch ("blessed" in Hebrew) Spinoza by his synagogue elders and known as Bento de Spinoza or Bento d'Espiñoza, but afterwards used the name Benedictus ("blessed" in Latin) de Spinoza.
Biography information from Wikiquote
Premium members can get their quote collection automatically imported into their Quotewise collections.
Related quotes. More quotes will automatically load as you scroll down, or you can use the load more buttons.
I also believe that Spinoza, like Nietzsche and Schopenhauer, on whose lives and philosophy I have based two earlier novels, wrote much that is highly relevant to my field of psychiatry and psychotherapy—for example, that ideas, thoughts, and feelings are caused by previous experiences, that passions may be studied dispassionately, that understanding leads to transcendence—and I wished to celebrate his contributions through a novel of ideas.
The significant writers to whom Spinoza has significantly mattered range across genres and sensibilities, and their reasons for considering him artistically relevant vary as widely as their methods of making him so. Some writers declared themselves devotees of his thought and were strengthened in their art by their interpretations of his views. Others were deeply bothered by some aspect of his system—his determinism, for example, or his insistence on the supremacy of reason over the passions—and made art out of their resistance. George Eliot (1819–1890), arguably the most philosophically inspired of the great nineteenth-century British novelists, falls into the first category. She decided to write fiction seven months after completing her translation of the Ethics, the first in English, and her view of her writing as a “set of experiments” is imprinted with certain Spinozist positions. The robust determinism to which she subjects her characters, as well as the conception of freedom and virtue that moves her plots along to their ethically resounding dénouements, bears the impressions of her close relationship with Spinoza's works.
Add semantic quote search to your AI assistant via MCP. One command setup.
يُسلِّم موسى بوجود موجودات تحلُّ محلَّ الله (ويحدُث ذلك بلا شكٍّ بأمرٍ من الله وبتفويضٍ منه) أي بموجودات أعطاها الله السُّلطة والحقَّ والقدرة لإرشاد الأُمَم ولحِمايتها والمُحافظة عليها. ولكنه نادى بأنَّ هذا الموجود الذي وجب على اليهود عبادَتُه هوَ الإله المُهيمِن الأعلى. وبعبارةٍ أُخرى، (أي بتعبيرٍ عبري) فهو إله الآلهة؛ لذلك يقول في نشيد الخروج (١٥: ١١): «من مثلك في الآلهة يا رب.» ويقول يترو (١٨: ١١): «الآن علمت أن الرب عظيم فوق جميع الآلهة.» أي أنَّني يجِب أن أُسَلِّم مع موسى بأن يَهوه أكبر الآلهة جميعًا، وله قُدرة لا نظير لها، ومع ذلك، فهل اعتقد موسى أنَّ الله خلق هذه الموجودات التي تقوم مكانه؟ يحقُّ لنا أن نَشُكَّ في ذلك لأنه — على ما نعلم — لم يَقُل شيئًا يتعلَّق بخلقِها ونشأتها