Howard P. Robertson Quotes

The solution of (1), which represents a homogeneous manifold, may be written in the form:<math>ds^2 = \frac{d\rho^2}{1 - \kappa^2\rho^2} - \rho^2 (d\theta^2 + sin^2 \theta \; d\phi^2) + (1 - \kappa^2 \rho^2)\; c^2 d\tau^2, \qquad (2)</math>where <math>\kappa = \sqrt \frac{\lambda}{3}</math>. If we consider <math>\rho</math> as determining distance from the origin... and <math>\tau</math> as measuring the proper-time of a clock at the origin, we are led to the de Sitter spherical world...

is a congruence geometry, or equivalently the space comprising its elements is homogeneous and isotropic; the intrinsic relations between... elements of a configuration are unaffected by the position or orientation of the configuration. ...[M]otions of are the familiar translations and rotations... made in proving the theorems of Euclid.

Now it is the practice of astronomers to assume that brightness falls off inversely with the square of the "distance" of an object—as it would do in Euclidean space, if there were no absorption... We must therefore examine the relation between this astronomer's "distance" <math>d</math>... and the distance <math>r</math> which appears as an element of the geometry.

We have merely (!) to measure the volume <math>V</math> of a sphere of radius <math>r</math> or the sum <math>\sigma</math> of the angles of a triangle of measured are <math>\delta</math>, and from the results to compute the value of <math>K</math>.

All the light which is radiated... will, after it has traveled a distance <math>r</math>, lie on the surface of a sphere whose area <math>S</math> is given by the first of the formulae (3). And since the practical procedure... in determining <math>d</math> is equivalent to assuming that all this light lies on the surface of a Euclidean sphere of radius <math>d</math>, it follows...<math>4 \pi d^2 = S = 4 \pi r^2 (1 - \frac{K r^2}{3} + ...);</math>whence, to our approximation 4)<math>d = r (1- \frac{K r^2}{6} + ...),</math> or
<math>r = d (1 + \frac{K d^2}{6} + ...).</math>

The search for the curvature <math>K</math> indicates that, after making all known corrections, the number N seems to increase faster with <math>d</math> than the third power, which would be expected in a Euclidean space, hence <math>K</math> is positive. The space implied thereby is therefore bounded, of finite total volume, and of a present "radius of curvature" <math>R = \frac{1}{K^\frac{1}{2}}</math> which is found to be of the order of 500 million light years. Other observations, on the "red shift" of light from these distant objects, enable us to conclude with perhaps more assurance that this radius is increasing...

[O]nly in a homogeneous and isotropic space can the traditional concept of a rigid body be maintained.

Measurements which may be made on the surface of the earth... is an example of a 2-dimensional congruence space of positive curvature <math>K = \frac{1}{R^2}</math>... [C]onsider... a "small circle" of radius <math>r</math> (measured on the surface!)... its perimeter <math>L</math> and area <math>A</math>... are clearly less than the corresponding measures <math>2\pi r</math> and <math>\pi r^2</math>... in the Euclidean plane. ...for sufficiently small <math>r</math> (i.e., small compared with <math>R</math>) these quantities on the sphere are given by 1):<math>L = 2 \pi r (1 - \frac{Kr^2}{6} + ...)</math>,
<math>A = \pi r^2 (1 - \frac{Kr^2}{12} + ...)</math>

In the sum <math>\sigma</math> of the three angles of a triangle (whose sides are arcs of s) is greater than two right angles [180°]; it can... be shown that this "spherical excess" is given by 2)<math>\sigma - \pi = K \delta</math>where <math>\delta</math> is the area of the spherical triangle and the angles are measured in s (in which 180° = <math>\pi</math> [radians]). Further, each full line (great circle) is of finite length <math>2 \pi R</math>, and any two full lines meet in two points—there are no parallels!

An "empty world," i.e., a homogeneous manifold at all points at which equations (1) are satisfied, has, according to the theory, a constant Riemann curvature, and any deviation from this fundamental solution is to be directly attributed to the influence of matter or energy.

What is needed is a homely experiment which could be carried out in the basement with parts from an old sewing machine and an Ingersoll watch, with an old file of Popular Mechanics standing by for reference! This I am, alas, afraid we have not achieved, but I do believe that the following example... is adequate to expose the principles...

[T]he space constant <math>K</math>... "" may in principle at least be determined by measurement on the surface, without recourse to its embodiment in a higher dimensional space.

This... is an outrageously over-simplified account of the assumptions and procedures...

[T]he astronomical data give the number N of nebulae counted out to a given inferred "distance" <math>d</math>, and in order to determine the curvature... we must express N, or equivalently <math>V</math>, to which it is assumed proportional, in terms of <math>d</math>. ...from the second of formulae (3) and... (4)... to the approximation here adopted, 5)<math>V = \frac{4}{3} \pi d^2 (1 + \frac{3}{10} K d^2 + ...);</math>...plotting N against... <math>d</math> and comparing... with the formula (5), it should be possible operationally to determine the "curvature" <math>K</math>.

The value of the intrinsic approach is especially apparent in considering 3-dimensional congruence spaces... The intrinsic geometry of such a space of curvature <math>K</math> provides formulae for the surface area <math>S</math> and the volume <math>V</math> of a "small sphere" of radius <math>r</math>, whose leading terms are 3)<math>S = 4 \pi r^2 (1 - \frac{Kr^2}{3} + ...)</math>,
<math>V = \frac{4}{3} \pi r^3 (1 - \frac{Kr^2}{5} + ...)</math>.