What is needed is a homely experiment which could be carried out in the basement with parts from an old sewing machine and an Ingersoll watch, with an old file of Popular Mechanics standing by for reference! This I am, alas, afraid we have not achieved, but I do believe that the following example... is adequate to expose the principles...

is a congruence geometry, or equivalently the space comprising its elements is homogeneous and isotropic; the intrinsic relations between... elements of a configuration are unaffected by the position or orientation of the configuration. ...[M]otions of are the familiar translations and rotations... made in proving the theorems of Euclid.

Go Premium

Support Quotewise while enjoying an ad-free experience and premium features.

View Plans
Let a thin, flat metal plate be heated... so that the temperature T is not uniform... clamp or otherwise constrain the plate to keep it from buckling... [and] remain [reasonably] flat... Make simple geometric measurements... with a short metal rule, which has a certain coefficient of expansion c... What is the geometry of the plate as revealed by the results of those measurements? ...[T]he geometry will not turn out to be Euclidean, for the rule will expand more in the hotter regions... [T]he plate will seem to have a negative curvature <math>K</math>... the kind of structure exhibited... in the neighborhood of a "."

Now it is the practice of astronomers to assume that brightness falls off inversely with the square of the "distance" of an object—as it would do in Euclidean space, if there were no absorption... We must therefore examine the relation between this astronomer's "distance" <math>d</math>... and the distance <math>r</math> which appears as an element of the geometry.

In what respect... does the general theory of relativity differ...? The answer is: in its universality; the force of gravitation in the geometrical structure acts equally on all matter. There is here a close analogy between the gravitational mass M...(Sun) and the inertial mass m... (Earth) on the one hand, and the heat conduction k of the field (plate)... and the coefficient of expansion c... on the other. ...The success of the general relativity theory... is attributable to the fact that the gravitational and inertial masses of any body are... rigorously proportional for all matter.

The field equation may... be given a geometrical foundation, at least to a first approximation, by replacing it with the requirement that the mean curvature of the space vanish at any point at which no heat is being applied to the medium—in complete analogy with... the general theory of relativity by which classical field equations are replaced by the requirement that the Ricci contracted curvature tensor vanish.

The general theory of relativity considers physical space-time as a four-dimensional manifold whose line element coefficients <math>g_{\mu \nu}</math> satisfy the differential equations<math>G_{\mu \nu} = \lambda g_{\mu \nu} \qquad .\;.\;.\;.\;.\;.\; (1)</math>in all regions free from matter and electromagnetic field, where <math>G_{\mu \nu}</math> is the contracted Riemann-Christoffel tensor associated with the fundamental tensor <math>g_{\mu \nu}</math>, and <math>\lambda</math> is the .

Share Your Favorite Quotes

Know a quote that's missing? Help grow our collection.

Measurements which may be made on the surface of the earth... is an example of a 2-dimensional congruence space of positive curvature <math>K = \frac{1}{R^2}</math>... [C]onsider... a "small circle" of radius <math>r</math> (measured on the surface!)... its perimeter <math>L</math> and area <math>A</math>... are clearly less than the corresponding measures <math>2\pi r</math> and <math>\pi r^2</math>... in the Euclidean plane. ...for sufficiently small <math>r</math> (i.e., small compared with <math>R</math>) these quantities on the sphere are given by 1):<math>L = 2 \pi r (1 - \frac{Kr^2}{6} + ...)</math>,
<math>A = \pi r^2 (1 - \frac{Kr^2}{12} + ...)</math>

The solution of (1), which represents a homogeneous manifold, may be written in the form:<math>ds^2 = \frac{d\rho^2}{1 - \kappa^2\rho^2} - \rho^2 (d\theta^2 + sin^2 \theta \; d\phi^2) + (1 - \kappa^2 \rho^2)\; c^2 d\tau^2, \qquad (2)</math>where <math>\kappa = \sqrt \frac{\lambda}{3}</math>. If we consider <math>\rho</math> as determining distance from the origin... and <math>\tau</math> as measuring the proper-time of a clock at the origin, we are led to the de Sitter spherical world...

All the light which is radiated... will, after it has traveled a distance <math>r</math>, lie on the surface of a sphere whose area <math>S</math> is given by the first of the formulae (3). And since the practical procedure... in determining <math>d</math> is equivalent to assuming that all this light lies on the surface of a Euclidean sphere of radius <math>d</math>, it follows...<math>4 \pi d^2 = S = 4 \pi r^2 (1 - \frac{K r^2}{3} + ...);</math>whence, to our approximation 4)<math>d = r (1- \frac{K r^2}{6} + ...),</math> or
<math>r = d (1 + \frac{K d^2}{6} + ...).</math>

In considerations involving the nature of the world as a whole the irregularities caused by the aggregation of matter into stars and stellar systems may be ignored; and if we further assume that the total matter in the world has but little effect on its macroscopic properties, we may consider them as being determined by the solution of an empty world.

That the existence of these motions (the "axiom of free mobility") is a desideratum, if not... a necessity, for a geometry applicable to physical space, has been forcefully argued on a priori grounds by von Helmholtz, Whitehead, Russell and others; for only in a homogeneous and isotropic space can the traditional concept of a rigid body be maintained.