Aside from Cauchy, the greatest contributory to the theory [of determinants] was Carl Gustav Jacob Jacobi. With him the word "determinant" received its final acceptance. He early used the functional determinant which Sylvester has called the Jacobian, and in his famous memoirs in Crelle's Journal for 1841 he considered these forms as well as that class of alternating functions which Sylvester has called alternants.
American mathematician (1860–1944)
(January 21, 1860 – July 29, 1944) was an American mathematician, educator, and editor.
From: Wikiquote (CC BY-SA 4.0)
It is difficult to say who it is who first recognized the advantage of always equating to zero in the study of the general equation. It may very likely have been Napier, for he wrote his De Arte Logistica before 1594, and in this there is evidence that he understood the advantage of this procedure. Bürgi also recognized the value of making the second member zero, Harriot may have done the same, and the influence of Descartes was such that the usage became fairly general.
PREMIUM FEATURE
Advanced Search Filters
Filter search results by source, date, and more with our premium search tools.
Vieta was the first algebraist after Ferrari to make any noteworthy advance in the solution of the biquadratic. He began with the type <math>x^4 + 2gx^2 + bx = c,</math> wrote it as <math>x^4 + 2gx^2 = c - bx,</math> added <math>gx^2 + \frac{1}{4}y^2 + yx^2 + gy</math> to both sides, and then made the right side a square after the manner of Ferrari. This method... requires the solution of a cubic resolvent.
Descartes (1637) next took up the question and succeeded in effecting a simple solution... a method considerably improved (1649) by his commentator Van Schooten. The method was brought to its final form by Simpson (1745).
The law which asserts that the equation X = 0, complete or incomplete, can have no more real positive roots than it has changes of sign, and no more real negative roots than it has permanences of sign, was apparently known to Cardan; but a satisfactory statement is possibly due to Harriot (died 1621) and certainly to Descartes.
The problem of the biquadratic equation was laid prominently before Italian mathematicians by Zuanne de Tonini da Coi, who in 1540 proposed the problem, "Divide 10 parts into three parts such that they shall be continued in proportion and that the product of the first two shall be 6." He gave this to Cardan with the statement that it could not be solved, but Cardan denied the assertion, although himself unable to solve it. He gave it to Ferrari, his pupil, and the latter, although then a mere youth, succeeded where the master had failed. ...This method soon became known to algebraists through Cardan's Ars Magna, and in 1567 we find it used by Nicolas Petri [of Deventer].
Although Cardan reduced his particular equations to forms lacking a term in <math>x^2</math>, it was Vieta who began with the general form<math>x^3 + px^2 + qx + r = 0</math>and made the substitution <math>x = y -\frac{1}{3}p,</math> thus reducing the equation to the form<math>y^3 + 3by = 2c.</math>He then made the substitution<math>z^3 + yz = b,</math> or <math>y = \frac{b - z^2}{z},</math>which led to the form<math>z^6 + 2cz^2 = b^2,</math>a sextic which he solved as a quadratic.
Unlimited Quote Collections
Organize your favorite quotes without limits. Create themed collections for every occasion with Premium.
Cardan's originality in the matter seems to have been shown chiefly in four respects. First, he reduced the general equation to the type <math>x^3 + bx = c</math>; second, in a letter written August 4, 1539, he discussed the question of the irreducible case; third, he had the idea of the number of roots to be expected in the cubic; and, fourth, he made a beginning in the theory of symmetric functions. ...With respect to the irreducible case... we have the cube root of a complex number, thus reaching an expression that is irreducible even though all three values of x turn out to be real. With respect to the number of roots to be expected in the cubic... before this time only two roots were ever found, negative roots being rejected. As to the question of symmetric functions, he stated that the sum of the roots is minus the coefficient of x<sup>2</sup>
[Zuanne de Tonini] da Coi... impuned Tartaglia to publish his method, but the latter declined to do so. In 1539 Cardan wrote to Tartaglia, and a meeting was arranged at which, Tartaglia says, having pledged Cardan to secrecy, he revealed the method in cryptic verse and later with a full explanation. Cardan admits that he received the solution from Tartaglia, but... without any explanation. At any rate, the two cubics <math>x^3 + ax^2 = c</math> and <math>x^3 + bx = c</math> could now be solved. The reduction of the general cubic <math>x^3 + ax^2 + bx = c</math> to the second of these forms does not seem to have been considered by Tartaglia at the time of the controversy. When Cardan published his Ars Magna however, he transformed the types <math>x^3 = ax^2 + c</math> and <math>x^3 + ax^2 = c</math> by substituting <math>x = y + \frac{1}{3}a</math> and <math>x = y - \frac{1}{3}a</math> respectively, and transformed the type <math>x^3 + c = ax^2</math> by the substitution <math>x = \sqrt {c^2/y},</math> thus freeing the equations of the term <math>x^2</math>. This completed the general solution, and he applied the method to the complete cubic in his later problems.
In the work of Vieta the analytic methods replaced the geometric, and his solutions of the quadratic equation were therefore a distinct advance upon those of his predecessors. For example, to solve the equation <math>x^2 + ax + b = 0</math> he placed <math>u + z</math> for <math>x</math>. He then had<math>u^2 + (2z + a)u +(z^2 + az + b) = 0.</math>He now let <math>2z + a = 0,</math> whence <math>z = -\frac{1}{2}a,</math>and this gave<math>u^2 - \frac{1}{4}(a^2 - 4b) = 0.</math>
<math>u = \pm \frac{1}{2} \sqrt{a^2 - 4b}.</math>and<math>x = u + z = -\frac{1}{2}a \pm \sqrt{a^2 - 4b}.</math>
The first noteworthy attempt to write an algebra in England was made by , whose Whetstone of witte (1557) was an excellent textbook for its time. The next important contribution was Masterson's incomplete treatise of 1592-1595, but the work was not up to the standard set by Recorde.
The first Italian textbook to bear the title of algebra was Bombelli's work of 1572. By this time elementary algebra was fairly well perfected, and it only remained to develop a good symbolism. ...this was worked out largely by Vieta (c. 1590), Harriot (c. 1610), Oughtred (c. 1628), Descartes (1637), and the British school of Newton's time (c. 1675).
So far as the great body of elementary algebra is concerned, therefore, it was completed in the 17th century.