Most tit for tat sharing has bad assumptions about how ideas spread I think. It’s an outdated top down view of the world.

When I find something cool I share it hundreds of times. I think it’s more valuable to find these people even if they don’t have an audience

Publishers should give much larger advances to fewer writers. Especially those who already have shown a proclivity to hire teams and spend money to build an audience. The publisher through a large advance then is basically hiring highly skilled creators (at a discount if they had to hire them directly)

sharing what you actually think is one of the most powerful things you can do via text

so much content is a performance for the algorithm. and much of people complimenting on said content is really congratulating a performance

good writing transcends self & commons