No man is good enough to govern any woman without her consent.

Men have no right to what is not reasonable, and to what is not for their benefit.

is absolutely wrong whether it's a man against a woman or a woman against a man.

Women can do nothing that has permanence.

A man has no right to occupy another man’s time unnecessarily

Whatever the lady does is wrong. I do not know of a single right decision taken by her.

Today, despite all of the gains we have made, neither men nor women have real choice. Until women have supportive employers and colleagues as well as partners who share family responsibilities, they don't have real choice. And until men are fully respected for contributing inside the home, they don't have real choice either.

Has woman the same rights in the state which man has? This question may appear ridiculous to many. For if the only ground of all legal rights is reason and freedom, how can a distinction exist between two sexes which possess both the same reason and the same freedom. Nevertheless, it seems that, so long as men have lived, this has been differently held, and the female sex seems not to have been placed on a par with the male sex in the exercise of its rights. Such a universal sentiment must have a ground, to discover which was never a more urgent problem than in our days.

You have no right to be jealous of a woman who wants to be more of a woman by watching a man dressed up as a woman.

There is no reason whatever to assume that woman, in her climb to emancipation, has been, or will be, helped by the ballot.

We cannot accept any code or creed that uniformly defrauds woman of all her natural rights.

No man has a right to free himself from the law of labour

No woman is really an insider in the institutions fathered by masculine consciousness.

You cannot have the right to do what is wrong!