Claude Lévi-Strauss Quotes

While I complain of being able to glimpse no more than the shadow of the past, I may be insensitive to reality as it is taking shape at this very moment, since I have not reached the stage of development at which I would be capable of perceiving it. A few hundred years hence, in this same place, another traveller, as despairing as myself, will mourn the disappearance of what I might have seen, but failed to see.

I never had, and still do not have, the perception of feeling my personal identity. I appear to myself as the place where something is going on, but there is no ‘I’, no ‘me.’ Each of us is a kind of crossroads where things happen. The crossroads is purely passive; something happens there. A different thing, equally valid, happens elsewhere. There is no choice, it is just a matter of chance.

So I can understand the mad passion for travel books and their deceptiveness. They create the illusion of something which no longer exists but still should exist, if we were to have any hope of avoiding the overwhelming conclusion that the history of the past twenty thousand years is irrevocable.

The world began without man and will end without him

From time to time, too, and for the space of two or three paces, an image or an echo would rise up from the recesses of time: in the little streets of the beaters of silver and gold, for instance, there was a clear, unhurried tinkling, as if a djinn with a thousand arms was absent-mindedly practising on a xylophone.

Yamyamlık gıda amaçlı olabilir (kıtlık döneminde ya da insan etini makbul bulmaktan ötürü); siyasî olabilir (suçluların cezalandırılması ya da düşmanlardan öç almak için); büyü amaçlı olabilir (dinsel bir tapınmaya, ölüler ya da olgunlaşma bayramına bağlı, ya da tarımda bereketi temin etmek için). Ve nihayet, kadim tıbbın ve zannedildiği kadar uzak olmayan bir geçmişte bizzat Avurpa'daki tıbbın pek çok reçetesinin de belgelediği gibi, şifa amaçlı olabilir. Sözünü ettiğim hipofiz zerki ve beyin maddelerinin nakli ve günümüzde yaygın bir uygulama hâline gelmiş olan organ nakillerinin bu son kategoriye girdiğine şüphe yok.

If this represents a basic need for order in the human mind and since, after all, the human mind is only part of the universe, the need probably exists because there is some order in the universe and the universe is not a chaos.

I may be subjected to the criticism of being called ‘scientistic’ or a kind of blind believer in science who holds that science is able to solve absolutely all problems. Well, I certainly don’t believe that, because I cannot conceive that a day will come when science will be complete and achieved.

Men can coexist on condition that they recognize each other as being all equally, though differently, human, but they can also coexist by denying each other a comparable degree of humanity, and thus establishing a system of subordination.

A day will come when the idea that for the sake of food the people of the past raised and massacred living beings and with complete equanimity displayed their flesh in bits and pieces in shop windows, will no doubt inspire the same revulsion that the cannibalistic meals of the Americans, Oceanians, or Africans inspired in the travelers of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.

We can understand, too, that natural species are chosen not because they are "good to eat" but because they are "good to think." [Les espèces sont choisies non commes bonnes à manger, mais comme bonnes à penser.]

Antropologlar, yaşam biçimlerimizin, inandığımız değerlerin, mümkün olan yegâne yaşam biçimleri ve değerler olmadığını; başka yaşam tarzlarının, başka değer sistemlerinin de insan topluluklarının mutluluğa ulaşmasına imkân vermiş olduğunu ve hâlâ da vermeye devam ettiğini kanıtlamaya çalışırlar. Dolayısıyla antropoloji, böbürlenmelerimize gem vurmaya, başka yaşam tarzlarına saygı duymaya, bizi şaşırtan, şoke eden ya da tiksindiren başka usulleri öğrenmek suretiyle kendimizi sorgulamaya çağırır bizleri.
...
Antropoloğun kendine özgü kültürler arasındaki farklara gösterdiği dikkat ve duyduğu saygı, yaklaşımının özünü oluşturur.

The more we claim to discriminate between cultures and customs as good and bad, the more completely do we identify ourselves with those we would condemn. By refusing to consider as human those who seem to us to be the most “savage” or “barbarous” of their representatives, we merely adopt one of their own characteristic attitudes. The barbarian is, first and foremost, the man who believes in barbarism.

Logically, the "infantilization" of the culprit implied by the notion of punishment demands that he should have a corresponding right to a reward, in the absence of which the initial procedure will prove ineffective and may even lead to results contrary to those that were hoped for. Our system is the height of absurdity, since we treat the culprit both as a child, so as to have the right to punish him, and as an adult, in order to deny him consolation; and we believe we have made great spiritual progress because, instead of eating a few of our fellow-men, we subject them to physical and moral mutilation.

The primary function for writing as a means of communication is to facilitate the enslavement of other human beings